Re: {strict,warnings}.pm consistency

[Gurusamy Sarathy <gsar@ActiveState.com>]

On Mon, 31 Jan 2000 09:59:45 CST, Greg Bacon wrote:
>Did you reach a verdict on this issue?  See
><URL:http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2000-01/msg01260.html>

Seems to me warnings.pm should do what strict.pm does w.r.t. to
ignoring things it doesn't know about.

The ability to add new warning classes/strictures without breaking
code sounds more valuable to me than the relative rare cases where
adding a warning would help.


Sarathy
gsar@ActiveState.com

---

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Top&Search][Original]

---