Re: [PATCH 63] check parms to strict.pm (was Re: [ID 20000125.006])

[Greg Bacon <gbacon@itsc.uah.edu>]

In message <E12DXpx-0005qe-00@ursa.cus.cam.ac.uk>,
    "M.J.T. Guy" writes:

: A check that the argument was a valid word might be a good idea, tho'.
: That would cause no compatibility problems, and would catch the case
: you originally quoted.

There is no compatibility problem.  It spits out a warning.  Regardless
of the course of action, we need a little consistency.  The version of
warnings.pm in 5.5.630 croaks when it sees an unrecognized option.
Both pragmata should behave in the same way.

Greg

---

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Top&Search][Original]

---