Re: [PATCH lib/lib.pm 5.005_63] Removing use of vars.pm

[Michael G Schwern <schwern@pobox.com>]

Michael G Schwern <schwern@pobox.com> writes:
> Is our() nice and stable and happy enough now to start using it for 5.6
> destined things?  Should I sweep the 200 or so occurances of C<use vars>
> out of the core libraries?  (Its a long, boring train ride home)

In light of the our() problems I just ran into, I'd say the answer is
"No" and I'll hold off on this until I'm sure _64 will contain a fix.

--

Michael G Schwern                                           schwern@pobox.com
                    http://www.pobox.com/~schwern
     /(?:(?:(1)[.-]?)?\(?(\d{3})\)?[.-]?)?(\d{3})[.-]?(\d{4})(x\d+)?/i

---

Follow-Ups from:

Gurusamy Sarathy <gsar@ActiveState.com>

References to:

Tom Christiansen <tchrist@chthon.perl.com>
Michael G Schwern <schwern@pobox.com>
Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>
Chris Nandor <pudge@pobox.com>

---

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Top&Search][Original]

---