[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Top&Search][Original]

Re: A common base exception object for Perl - RFC



Graham Barr wrote:

> I feel that there needs to be some defined "syntactic sugar" otherwise
> having a defined class is of no great benefit as people will use it
> differently.

TMTOWTDI :)

One for Larry, I think: should Perl prescribe, suggest or be agnostic
about exception handling syntax?

> True, but don't throw error out just because you don't like the syntatic
> sugar. It already defines a base class. It just needs to be separated out.

Indeed. I'll do some deeper investigation...

Pete
-- 
use Disclaimer::Standard;	# Motorola GSM Software Factory
my $phone='+44 1793 564450';	# "'Not twisted,' Salzy once said of
my $fax='+44 1793 566918';	#  her own passion, 'it is helical.
my $mobile='+44 7973 725120';	#  That sounds better.'"


Follow-Ups from:
Larry Wall <larry@wall.org>
References to:
Pete Jordan <pjordan1@email.mot.com>
Graham Barr <gbarr@pobox.com>
Pete Jordan <pjordan1@email.mot.com>
Graham Barr <gbarr@pobox.com>

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Top&Search][Original]