[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Top&Search][Original]
exists &sub (was: exists $foo[7] and delete $foo[7])
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000 16:28:44 -0800 (PST), Larry Wall wrote (in part):
law> Other way around. It exists if there's a stub, but is
law> defined if the stub has been assigned a body. Conveniently,
law> that is consistent with the current definition of
law> defined(&foo), which returns false on a mere stub.
The question remains, though (as I asked in
<200001160717.CAA14080@Orb.Nashua.NH.US>):
Is C<exists &sub> something we should add? Why? If so, should
it be for 5.6?
(See
http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2000-01/msg00695.html
for further details on the question.)
--spider
- Follow-Ups from:
-
Larry Wall <larry@wall.org>
- References to:
-
Larry Wall <larry@wall.org>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Top&Search][Original]