Re: v5.5.640 plans

[Dan Sugalski <dan@sidhe.org>]

At 01:14 PM 1/5/00 -0800, Gurusamy Sarathy wrote:
>On Wed, 05 Jan 2000 16:01:22 EST, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> >Still, I gather this is all interim stuff, as I imagine 5.6 won't really
> >have 2 different supported "threads" models.
>
>That's what I'm shooting for, but depending on how much work gets done
>(or not done), we may or may not be able to lift the "experimental"
>qualifier from the usethreads support.

We're shooting for ithreads under the hood, right? Do we want to have both 
the ithread model and current thread model visible from the perl level, or 
just toss the current model entirely?

					Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
dan@sidhe.org                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk

---

Follow-Ups from:

Gurusamy Sarathy <gsar@ActiveState.com>

References to:

Gurusamy Sarathy <gsar@ActiveState.com>

---

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Top&Search][Original]

---